Nanotheranostics 2017; 1(1):1-22. doi:10.7150/ntno.17109 This issue Cite

Review

Remotely Triggered Nano-Theranostics For Cancer Applications

Alexandra Sneider, Derek VanDyke, Shailee Paliwal, Prakash Rai

University of Massachusetts Lowell, Department of Chemical Engineering, Francis College of Engineering, 1 University Ave, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.

Citation:
Sneider A, VanDyke D, Paliwal S, Rai P. Remotely Triggered Nano-Theranostics For Cancer Applications. Nanotheranostics 2017; 1(1):1-22. doi:10.7150/ntno.17109. https://www.ntno.org/v01p0001.htm
Other styles

File import instruction

Abstract

Graphic abstract

Nanotechnology has enabled the development of smart theranostic platforms that can concurrently diagnose disease, start primary treatment, monitor response, and, if required, initiate secondary treatments. Recent in vivo experiments demonstrate the promise of using theranostics in the clinic. In this paper, we review the use of remotely triggered theranostic nanoparticles for cancer applications, focusing heavily on advances in the past five years. Remote triggering mechanisms covered include photodynamic, photothermal, phototriggered chemotherapeutic release, ultrasound, electro-thermal, magneto-thermal, X-ray, and radiofrequency therapies. Each section includes a brief overview of the triggering mechanism and summarizes the variety of nanoparticles employed in each method. Emphasis in each category is placed on nano-theranostics with in vivo success. Some of the nanotheranostic platforms highlighted include photoactivatable multi-inhibitor nanoliposomes, plasmonic nanobubbles, reduced graphene oxide-iron oxide nanoparticles, photoswitching nanoparticles, multispectral optoacoustic tomography using indocyanine green, low temperature sensitive liposomes, and receptor-targeted iron oxide nanoparticles loaded with gemcitabine. The studies reviewed here provide strong evidence that the field of nanotheranostics is rapidly evolving. Such nanoplatforms may soon enable unique advances in the clinical management of cancer. However, reproducibility in the synthesis procedures of such “smart” platforms that lend themselves to easy scale-up in their manufacturing, as well as the development of new and improved models of cancer that are more predictive of human responses, need to happen soon for this field to make a rapid clinical impact.

Keywords: nanomedicine, oncology, externally-triggered, image guided, photoactivated.


Citation styles

APA
Sneider, A., VanDyke, D., Paliwal, S., Rai, P. (2017). Remotely Triggered Nano-Theranostics For Cancer Applications. Nanotheranostics, 1(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.7150/ntno.17109.

ACS
Sneider, A.; VanDyke, D.; Paliwal, S.; Rai, P. Remotely Triggered Nano-Theranostics For Cancer Applications. Nanotheranostics 2017, 1 (1), 1-22. DOI: 10.7150/ntno.17109.

NLM
Sneider A, VanDyke D, Paliwal S, Rai P. Remotely Triggered Nano-Theranostics For Cancer Applications. Nanotheranostics 2017; 1(1):1-22. doi:10.7150/ntno.17109. https://www.ntno.org/v01p0001.htm

CSE
Sneider A, VanDyke D, Paliwal S, Rai P. 2017. Remotely Triggered Nano-Theranostics For Cancer Applications. Nanotheranostics. 1(1):1-22.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
Popup Image