Nanotheranostics 2024; 8(1):12-32. doi:10.7150/ntno.89768 This issue Cite


Choice of Nanoparticles for Theranostics Engineering: Surface Coating to Nanovalves Approach

Rajendra Prasad1 Corresponding address, Kaliaperumal Selvaraj2,3 Corresponding address

1. Interventional Theranostics & Multimode Imaging Lab, School of Biochemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2. Nano and Computational Materials Lab, Catalysis and Inorganic Chemistry Division, CSIR National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411008, India.
3. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002 India.

Prasad R, Selvaraj K. Choice of Nanoparticles for Theranostics Engineering: Surface Coating to Nanovalves Approach. Nanotheranostics 2024; 8(1):12-32. doi:10.7150/ntno.89768.
Other styles

File import instruction


Graphic abstract

Surface engineered nanoparticles (metallic and nonmetallic) have gained tremendous attention for precise imaging and therapeutics of cell/tumors at molecular and anatomic levels. These tiny agents have shown their specific physicochemical properties for early-stage disease diagnosis and cancer theranostics applications (imaging and therapeutics by a single system). For example, gold nanorods (AuNRs) demonstrate better photothermal response and radiodensity for theranostics applications. However, upon near infrared light exposure these AuNRs lose their optical property which is characteristic of phototherapy of cancer. To overcome this issue, silica coating is a safe choice for nanorods which not only stabilizes them but also provides extra space for cargo loading and makes them multifunctional in cancer theranostics applications. On the other hand, various small molecules have been coated on the surface of nanoparticles (organic, inorganic, and biological) which improve their biocompatibility, blood circulation time, specific biodistribution and tumor binding ability. A few of them have been reached in clinical trials, but, struggling with FDA approval due to engineering and biological barriers. Moreover, nanoparticles also face various challenges of reliability, reproducibility, degradation, tumor entry and exit in translational research. On the other hand, cargo carrier nanoparticles have been facing critical issues of premature leakage of loaded cargo either anticancer drug or imaging probes. Hence, various gate keepers (quantum dots to supramolecules) known nanovalves have been engineered on the pore opening of the cargo systems. Here, a review on the evolution of nanoparticles and their choice for diagnostics and therapeutics applications has been discussed. In this context, basic requirements of multifunctional theranostics design for targeted imaging and therapy have been highlighted and with several challenges. Major hurdles experienced in the surface engineering routes (coating to nanovalves approach) and limitations of the designed theranostics such as poor biocompatibility, low photostability, non-specific targeting, low cargo capacity, poor biodegradation and lower theranostics efficiency are discussed in-depth. The current scenario of theranostics systems and their multifunctional applications have been presented in this article.


Nano(bio)technology has remarkable impact on nanomedicine especially cancer theranostics. Nanoparticles of metals (gold, silver, iron, copper, bismuth), self-assemblies of biomolecules (viz., liposomes, micelles, dendrimers, etc.), various carbon-based nanomaterials (carbon/graphene quantum dots, nanoflakes, nanolayers, nanosheets, etc.), recently replacing several fluorescent organic dyes and their composites are some of the recent best examples for various biomedical systems including drug delivery systems, image contrasts and combination therapeutics. Complicated synthesis routes, poor biocompatibility, low photo-stability, non-specific targeting, low cargo capacity, poor biodegradation and lower theranostics efficiency are the general major hurdles with these materials. Rapidly emerging advanced systems for biomedical applications, namely multifunctional theranostics agents are designed to support multiple tasks in diagnosis and advanced therapy. Developing a successful one for the combined therapeutic approaches of cancer viz., chemo, photothermal and ablation etc. along with diagnosis is a crucial necessity at this juncture. Among the above liposomes, PEGylated silica-gold nanoshell (AuroShell) and silica-quantum dots (C dots-silica composite) are few that have been approved for clinical trials. The recent recognition of liposomes, gold and mesoporous silica (MS) by US FDA as safe material for human trials is another milestone for in this area. The present article deals closely with this area and involves several of the mentioned materials.

Few positive attempts in designing such theranostics agents during the course of degree have been presented here. This includes multifunctional nanohybrid systems that can support (a) diagnosis (X-ray CT and fluorescence), (b) chemotherapy (using doxorubicin a popular anti-cancer drug) and (c) photothermal therapy/ablation (using NIR laser) along with various features such as targeted, triggered and bio-responsive drug release etc. Designing such systems through simple, rapid, and ambient recipes is an apparent demand. Very recently attempts have been made in this area and with reports displaying major challenges involved in this. Main task is to ensure structurally embedding several individual components and yet to assure a synergistic and better controlled performance. Reproducibility associated with such systems while scaling up production is another important challenge. In this context, the main objective of the research problem addressing through this article is (i) to design multifunctional hybrid nanomaterials (ii) to successfully embed various functional components (for applications viz., targeting, contrast and therapeutics) in single system and (iii) to ensure their performance for cancer theranostics. This includes the use of various components such as mesoporous silica, gold nanorods, carbon quantum dots, NIR responsive graphene oxide flakes, liposomes etc. Several positive attempts are briefly described in different sections along with complete scientific details.

An overview of nanoparticle research for cancer theranostics (diagnosis and therapeutics) along with the statement of concerns and research developments have been discussed here. A section highlights the importance of plasmonic theranostics viz., gold nanorods (GNRs) for cancer diagnosis and photothermal therapy. A surfactant named cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is known as a structure directing agent for stabilizing GNRs, however, is a limitation in its biomedical application due to its toxicity. To overcome the biocompatibility and stability concerns, silica layers coating on GNR's surface has been utilized and even tested in in vivo models. This core-shell nanotheranostics exhibit improved contrast ability, good circulation time, targeted combination therapeutics and other multifunctionality. To the best of our knowledge and expertise, bare porous silica, especially mesoporous silica (MS) has been reported for drug delivery applications with high cargo capacity (more than 50 %) and surface area (900-1000 m2/g). However, premature leakage of loaded cargo is the major issue of such hybrid delivery system. Our group has resolved this problem by using bio-responsive fluorescent carbon dots as nano-gates on the exterior surface of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. This nano-gated platform performs theranostics response with intracellular tracking of cellular components through fluorescence emission and its bio-responsive drug release in cancer mimicked environment. However, in nanotheranostics, low biocompatibility and slow biodegradation of inorganic systems are major concerns. Recently, a few groups including us have designed biodegradable systems based on soft assemblies known as liposomal nanoparticles and their surface engineering. Overall accomplishments and potential future scopes of the research area have been summarized in this review.

Engineering and choice of nanoparticles in theranostics

Manipulation of matter at atomic, molecular and supramolecular scale to create materials with remarkably new properties is a rapidly expanding area of materials engineering [1-4]. Surface engineering science involves an understanding of interconnect between synthesis routes, structural design and properties of the nanoparticles of nanohybrid materials [3]. Depending upon the property, a well-designed multifunctional material could have promising applications in the areas spanning chemistry, physics, biology and engineering [3,5,6]. To date, functional hybrid nanomaterials have been applied in various fields especially for imaging and therapeutics of cancer shown in Table 1 [7-13]. One of the most significant and impactful applications of nanomaterials is in the area of nanomedicine. So far, several nano sized hybrid/composite materials (nanohybrids/nanocomposites) are being applied as diagnostic or therapeutic probes with their tremendous impact on human health [14,15]. Further, a single hybrid nanostructure capable of multi-model diagnostics and combined therapies (chemo-photothermal therapy, chemo-photodynamic, photothermal-photodynamic therapy etc.) is an area of recent development with possible significant outcome on health care [15-24]. Integration of multiple components with multiple functions at nano level produces hybrid nanostructures that allows the above interest of application [18,22,24].

In the context of human health care, imbalances in genetic and recently evolving environmental factors increase the possibilities of multifactorial complex diseases such as cancer, a leading cause of mortality in the modern world [2]. Cancer is understood in a better way from the genetic, molecular, and cellular biology viewpoints requiring new strategies of diagnosis and treatment. In cancer, nanotechnology-based medicine has great potential in the area of new drug delivery systems, multifunctional diagnostics and as therapeutic agents [7,16].

 Table 1 

Nanoparticle formulations and their clinical status [9,11]

Nanoparticle formulationApplicationsStatus
Technetium-99m rhenium sulfide colloidBio-imagingApproved in European countries
Iron oxide nanoparticlesBio-imagingApproved by FDA 1996
Hafnium oxide nanoparticlesTherapyClinical trials
64Cu labelled liposome loaded with doxorubicinCancer TheranosticsPhase I (2017)
64Cu labelled polyglucose nanoparticlesBio-imagingPhase I (2021)
124I or 89Zr labelled silica nanoparticlesBio-imagingPhase I (2022); NCT01266096, Active (2021)
NIR fluorophore tagged RGD-silica nanoparticlesBio-imagingNCT02106598, Phase I/II, Recruiting (2022)
Silica-gold core-shellTherapyNCT00848042, Completed (2017) NCT02680535, Completed (2021)
PEGylated gold nanoparticlesTargeted therapyPhase I
Nucleic acids conjugated gold nanoparticlesTherapyNCT03020017, Phase I, Completed (2020)
Aminosilane-SPIO nanoparticlesTherapyPhase I
CdS/ZnS quantum dotsBio-imaging and TherapyPhase I
89Zr labelled polymeric nanoparticles loaded with docetaxelBio-imaging and TherapyNCT03742713, Phase II, Completed (2020)
Fluorophore tagged organic micelleBio-imaging and TheranosticsNCT03735680, Phase II, Completed (2022) NCT05048082, Phase II, Recruiting (2022)
Albumin colloidBio-imagingClinically approved
Lipo-Dox (Taiwan Liposome)TherapyClinically approved
Liposomal alendronateTherapyUnder clinical trial
Doxorubicin liposomes Doxil (Janssen products)TherapyPhase II
Gd-polysiloxane nanoformulationsBio-imaging and TheranosticsUnder clinical trial

Comprehensively used various nanoparticles (NPs) for this have overall dimensions less than several hundred nanometers and are comparable to large biomolecules, such as enzymes, receptors and antibodies [16-20]. On account of this specific physical property, these nanoparticles (NPs) exhibit excellent interactions with biomolecules present on the exterior and interior environment of cancer cells. However, generally, nonspecific targeting nature, multiple heavy dose requirements of contrast agents and drugs, poor water solubility, rapid clearance and time-consuming planning are limiting their applications in today's diagnosis and therapies [25]. In addition, traditionally used chemotherapy and radiation therapy treatments are less effective for cancer patients due to side effects from heavily used radiation and drug molecules [26-29]. As solution to above, nanoparticles designed with combined diagnostic and therapeutic abilities is a recently developing concept for cancer detection and targeted therapies [26,28]. Performing high efficiency of both imaging and therapeutic functions by a single hybrid material is the major advantage of nanosized multifunctional systems and consequently various research efforts have been devoted towards this.

Nanotheranostics and advantages

In 2008, the major challenges and opportunities within newly designed medical products are reported by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [30]. On the other hand, John Funkhouser, the Chief Executive Officer of PharmaNetics, introduced the term “Theranostics” (meaning diagnostics and therapeutics by a single system) for the first time in 1998 as a concept. Furthermore, the primary objective of theranostics is to be able to monitor the response of treatment, effect of drug efficacy and safety for healthcare systems. Recent advances in nano biomedicine have expanded the ability to design and fabricate multifunctional nanoparticles that combine targeting, therapeutic and diagnostic functions in a single nanoplatform [22-24,31,32] in the specific that integrates, the combination of contrast/diagnostics (molecular imaging) and therapeutics agent (molecular targeted treatment “all-in one” Figure 1) [32]. Imaging and therapeutic modality have their unique strengths for medical diagnosis and treatment. Imaging has advantages for diagnosis from two or more imaging modalities in a single platform that provides overall structural and molecular information [33,34]. Similarly, the multimodality in therapy also shows their significant advantage on cancer cell/tumor elimination [23]. Combined modalities of diagnostic and therapeutic agent in a single system at nanoscopic level is newly emerging as “nano-theranostics” an urgent need for nanomedicine.

Their major and visible advantages are high water solubility, specific optical properties, good biocompatibility, high theranostics efficiency, easy to functionalize with biomolecules (capping agent/targeting ligands), high cargo capacity, smooth circulation, localized binding ability and high tumor accumulation [29,31-34]. Image guided stimuli triggered targeted cancer therapy could be a new rapid advance for theranostics. The distinct advantage of these theranostics is to provide localized and detailed information and therapy in specific sites of diseases [35-39]. However, challenges such as optimal circulation, biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion remain as major concern and are currently being addressed [40-50].

Components of theranostics system

A successful design of a theranostics system essentially needs understanding of various functions and the components that perform them. Nanosized imaging (contrast/emissive media) and therapeutic agent in a single system is a recent development in nanomedicine [20-24,32,35,39]. Today, several diagnostic techniques such as positron-emission tomography (PET), X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT), optical coherence tomography (OCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) etc. are routine procedures in hospitals due to the unparalleled and complementary details that they can provide about the interior body [35,36]. These techniques are becoming progressively a significant piece of the diagnostic portfolio available to physicians that helps in the understanding the specific location of tumor in animal or human body. In order to facilitate the understanding of healthcare practitioners on the abnormalities of a diagnostic image, contrast agents are often employed to create visible changes in the resulting image after interacting with the incident radiation [35]. The above imaging modalities are heavily dependent on the choice of contrast agents and thus this makes one important function/component of theranostics system. The development of nanosized novel and improved contrast agents has significant impact to this field further improvement on their contrast ability, biocompatibility, targeting ability and specific bio-distribution etc are intensively being investigated [35].

Among all, the X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) technique provides detailed three-dimensional (3D) anatomic information with high resolution and good brightness [51]. X-ray CT is one of the commenly used imaging techniques due to its wide availability, high efficiency and quick response. This technique is characteristically accomplished by stimulating multiple X-rays from different angles to form slices which can further be composited collectively to form a detailed set of cross-sectional image [52]. In this context, iodine and gadolinium based contrast agents are commonly used due to atomic number and X-ray attenuation [35]. However, these contrast agents suffer from many problems including short circulation half time (<10 min. for conventional iodinated contrast), nonspecific bio-distribution, rapid excretion and renal toxicity, poor contrast ability, high dose requirement (~ 100-400 mg/mL concentration) [35,51,52]. Hence, in recent years, various nanosized contrast agents have been developed which are able to overcome many of these shortcomings. Nano-formulations of bismuth, barium, gadolinium, dysprosium, ytterbium, tantalum, gold nanoparticles, etc. with high atomic number and X-ray absorption coefficient have been investigated for multimodal diagnosis [35]. Various fluorescent contrast agents such as organic dyes, NIR responsive quantum dots (metal and graphene/carbon dots) for emissive diagnosis are also designed in recent years [53,54].

 Figure 1 

Representative nanoparticles based targeted theranostics design.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

 Figure 2 

(a) Schematic of surface engineered nanotheranostics, (b) Spin-spin relaxation rate, (c) fluorescence (FL) spectra of ICG dye tagged engineered nanotheranostics, (d) in vitro cancer cell imaging and therapeutics and (e) in vivo tumor imaging followed by multimode imaging modalities. Reproduced with permission from Acc. Chem. Res., 2011, 44, 936 published by American Chemical Society.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

Another major component of theranostics system is a carrier system that transports the contrast agent and/or therapeutic agent to the interested specific site with the help of a targeting ligand (Figure 1 and Figure 2). A number of carrier systems are designed with their high cargo loading capacity such as inorganic porous hollow spheres, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, magneto-plasmonic nanocapsules, gold nano shells, liposomal, polymeric and graphene oxide nanoparticles, etc [35,55-61]. The combination of both imaging agent and carrier in one system fulfills the fundamental criteria of nanotheranostics. These hybrids facilitate easy functionalization of targeting ligands on its surface to have longer circulation (at least 24 h), specific targeting and bio-distribution [23,40].

External stimuli responsive combined therapeutics viz., chemo-photothermal therapy, chemo-photodynamic therapy, photothermal-photodynamic therapy are other important capabilities of theranostics systems. Combining above mentioned multiple therapies into a single system are more effective and significant for cancer treatment. Various nanohybrids/nano-composites such as gold nanorods embedded porous silica, dye loaded mesoporous silica, MoS2 nanohybrids, NIR light responsive and thermal responsive graphene-gold nanohybrids/ nano-composites etc. have been explored for combined therapeutic applications due to their high rate of light-to-heat conversion, drug loading capacity, a large amount of reactive oxygen species generation, etc [8,12,17,18,22]. Imaging agent integrated therapeutics platforms have been engineered by surface coating/core-shell and surface conjugation. In the case of porous hybrid theranostics systems, premature leakage of loaded cargo is always a critical concern. To prevent the premature release of therapeutics molecules before reaching them to the target site, nano-valved approach has been proposed recently. This surface coated and nano-gated engineered theranostics systems satisfy the theranostics requirements with several advantages as shown in Figure 3. Next generation of combined therapy will help in following: (i) reduced side effects, (ii) enhanced efficacy of therapeutic outcomes, (iii) improved survival and quality of life of cancer patients.

Current scenario of integrated nano-imaging and therapeutic agents

Theranostics with additional functions are progressively getting popular especially with combined therapeutic abilities [18,22]. From molecular understanding to clinical trials, few of them have been translated. Some are on in vivo studies [22-25]. Fabrication of nano sized theranostics systems is highly interesting for medical scientists. However, large scale production through rapid process, aqueous solubility, high cargo capacity, localized controlled release, biocompatibility, circulation, and specific targeting ability are the major concerns and also current demands for any types of theranostics [61-63]. Designing bio-responsive, degradable and targeted nanotheranostics systems are though of current demand for nanomedicine yet remain as major challenges. The designed theranostics systems should be able to show their best performance at specific sites in cancer cells or at tumor environment. Thus, real time monitoring of delivered nanotheranostics in cancer mimicked environment can be made possible to provide critical information about specific diagnostics and therapeutic efficiency. So far, various nanoparticles such as metal (Au, Ag, Fe, WS2), liposome, polymers, mesoporous silica, silica coated gold nanorods, graphene quantum dots, nano-gated porous silica, up-conversion luminescent materials and many more have been used for multifunctional theranostics applications [34,64]. A number of studies have confirmed their potential usage for theranostics, and various formulations of these nanoparticles are already in the preclinical and clinical stages of development. For example, PEGlated silica-gold nanoshell (AuroShell) as a photothermal agent, silica-quantum dots (C dots-silica composite) for molecular imaging, PEGlated liposomal doxorubicin for ovarian cancer treatment, etc., are used for human trials for the first time [65-69]. Several other nano sized formulations are under clinical trials and many more are currently being evaluated at the preclinical level for cancer diagnosis and treatment [69]. However, several properties of these theranostics systems need to be understood such as surface chemistry, dispersibility/solubility, stability, doses/concentration, biocompatibility, circulation time, pharmacokinetics, specific bio-distribution, and specific site binding ability prior to clinical applications. This enables them to become an important clinical weapon for cancer cure in the near future.

On other hand, traditionally used chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation therapy show heavy side effects on health [70]. These conventional therapeutics require further improvements for better and fast treatment without any side effects. Photothermal therapy (PTT, photothermal agents which exhibit strong absorption in the near-infrared region (600-1100 nm), photodynamic therapy (PDT, oxidize targeted site via singlet oxygen which causes cell damage and death), thermal and magnetic hyperthermia have recently gained popularity as compared to the conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy [22-24,34].

 Figure 3 

Schematics of surface engineered nanotheranostics. (Top) surface covering/coating of nanoparticles viz., liposomal surface covering with gold nanorods and graphene oxide, gold nanorods surface coating with silica shell, reproduced with permission from Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 5, 1510, Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 12, 4012, ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 8, 3312 published by American Chemical Society. (Bottom) mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their pores are valved/or gated with nanodots of carbon reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 2, 1693 published by American Chemical Society, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 4537 published by Royal Society of Chemistry and J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 40, 19496 published by American Chemical Society.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

Nanoparticles for theranostics engineering

As discussed above, various metallic and nonmetallic nanoparticles have been proposed and tested for theranostics applications. However, overall theranostics performance may be compromised while integrating imaging and therapeutics probes within a single system. It should be noted that sufficient chemical and physical protection of biological cargo molecules or payloads is possible by engineering safe carrier systems to deliver the loaded cargos to the desired target site. So far, several organic and inorganic carrier theranostics systems have been designed at nanoscopic level. Surface modifiers are attached to these systems and estimated to provide theranostics nanomaterials with additional properties such as preventing premature leakage of loaded cargos, long circulation time, barrier-penetrating ability and specific binding ability [28]. Further, several organic-inorganic combinations are tried especially after 2005 and experienced a considered a rapid progress in nanomaterials design bringing about new opportunities for cancer diagnosis and treatment as shown in Figure 3 [71-73].

Several cancer theranostics strategies are based on non-metallic, metallic, and composite nanohybrids [73]. Fluorescent diagnosis and drug delivery are a major part of non-metallic systems. These systems are generally designed by carbon (top-down and bottom-up approaches) nanoparticles, organic dyes, soft materials (polymeric, micelles, surfactants etc.) and silica based (sol-gel methods) framework, etc [35]. Due to aqueous solubility, good photoluminescence and stability, various formulations of carbon nanoparticles such as carbon quantum dots, graphene quantum dots, graphene oxide nano sheets, etc. are used as fluorescent diagnostics probe [74]. In addition, various classes of mesoporous silica such as MCM-41, MCM-48, SBA-15, hollow silica spheres etc. highly explored for drug delivery applications [75]. High surface area (700-1000 m2/g), highly ordered pores (2-50 nm in range), high cargo capacity (10-50 % of doxorubicin anticancer drug) and easy surface functionalization are the main features of these materials for biomedical applications [22-26,75].

On the other side, various metal nanoparticles like gold nanoparticles (many faces of gold, such as spheres, nanorods, nanocage, cubes, shell, nanoclusters, hollow), iron nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles are widely used for biomedical applications due to their unique characteristics such as highly tunable optical properties, contrast ability (high atomic number), specific surface plasmonic nature, good hyperthermia and photothermal efficiency [76,77]. Moreover, these nanoparticles can efficiently convert incident light/radiofrequencies into heat [18,22]. However, lack of chemotherapeutic efficiency of these nanoparticles limits their theranostics conditions [19]. Further, the combination of non-metallic and metallic components in a single system is the better way to overcome the theranostics problems. The theranostics design depends on the interest of application. For example, gold nanorods-mesoporous silica nanohybrid [18] is suitable for CT based diagnosis and NIR responsive multifunctional cancer theranostics while nanovalved mesoporous silica nanohybrid [75] is fit for stimuli responsive triggered drug delivery with multimodal bio-imaging and iron oxide-silica composites are commonly used for MRI and magnetic hyperthermia for cancer theranostics etc.

To the best of our knowledge, nano sized metallic and non-metallic theranostics systems are limited due high cost of precursors, sophisticated and time-consuming synthesis process, poor control on premature cargo release, low product yield, poor stability, uncontrolled growth and particle size, low biocompatibility, nonspecific targeting ability and bio-distribution, poor image resolution, low cargo capacity, etc [34,35,38,47,63]. In addition, several organic dyes and quantum dots have been studied for molecular imaging but due to poor photo blinking, photostability and biocompatibility, these are not recommended for in vivo or clinical applications but limited only for in vitro level [78]. As a consequence, extensive efforts have been made to design new theranostics systems which can prevail over the above-mentioned limitations. Recent studies demonstrate that the mesoporous silica (MS, explored and declared as a safe material for human trials by US FDA) is recognized as a good cargo carrier due to its high surface area, pore size tunability, high cargo capacity, easy surfaces functionalization (both exterior and interior) with biomolecules and targeting ligands, chemical and physical inertness, good biocompatibility etc [79]. Mesoporous silica based nanohybrids are highly recommended as a drug delivery system (DDS) due to high surface area, cargo capacity and easy surface modification shown in Figure 4. Clinical acceptance and trial (about 10) of silica-based hybrid nanoparticles ensure their safety profile in humans. It has been noticed that silica nanoparticles have shown good tolerability and better pharmacokinetic profile of hydrophobic drugs with no serious side effects. For example, surface modified silica hybrids viz., lipid coated silica particles have been used in 16 healthy adults for oral delivery of ibuprofen. These surface modified silica particles demonstrate 1.9 times higher bioavailability than bare silica nanoparticles. On the other hand, in another clinical trial (in 12 adults), lipoceramic-silica nanoparticles have demonstrated 3.5-fold higher bioavailability as compared to the commercially available simvastatin formulation Sandoz (ACTRN12618001929291). Overall, architectural control and surface decoration of these porous cargo carriers have brought new possibilities for controlled drug delivery in nanomedicine [75].

 Figure 4 

(a) Design of surface coated multifunctional mesoporous porous system and their (b) microscopic image and (c) HeLa cancer cell imaging, surface area isotherm and pore size distribution (inset) and time dependent fluorescent cargo release performance of conjugated silica-based nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1, 197 and ACS Nano 2021, 15, 4450 published by American Chemical Society.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

Surface coated nanotheranostics systems

So far, various nanoparticles have been proposed and tested for bio-imaging and therapeutic applications of cancer, but individually. Integrating these two components within a single system brings theranostics possibility. Such designs can be achieved via surface coating methodologies where imaging agents are in the core of therapeutics shell and the other way around. For example, mesoporous silica (MS), graphene quantum dots/flakes, liposomes, gold nanoparticles (GNPs), etc. are being widely used particles for cancer imaging and therapeutics individually. Combining any two materials in one system augments their overall theranostics performance due to high surface area, high cargo payload, better stability, and easy surface modification. For example, encapsulation of GNPs in deep MS shell and covering liposomal surface with graphene oxide flakes/emissive dots are current thrust area in nanomedicine and cancer theranostics. In brief, alone gold nanoparticle can perform bio-imaging application but cannot carry extra amount of cargo molecules to perform theranostics response whereas parent silica can carry high cargo molecules but cannot demonstrate stimuli responsive therapeutics named as photodynamic or photothermal therapy. Hence, the combination of these two components at nanoscale followed by molecular engineering turned out in new theranostics design. It has been noticed that the precise encapsulation of gold nanoparticles (especially gold nanorods, GNRs) in a single deep MS with high surface area (more than 900 m2/g) and cargo capacity (more than 40 %) at the large-scale production has been noticed as a challenging task. Based on the literature survey we have noticed that this is ongoing research in countries like India, USA, China, Japan, Singapore etc. for various applications. It has been well documented that to maintain the stability and optical property of gold nanorods (GNRs) only, thin layers of mesoporous silica (MS) are deposited over gold nanoparticles [23]. The designed nanoparticles are further used for multifunctional cancer theranostics (diagnostics and therapeutics) such as contrast agent for X-ray computed tomography imaging (X-ray CT) of cancer cells/tumor and NIR responsive photothermal therapy for various cancer cell lines as shown in Figure 5.

It is well documented that several compositions of functional inorganic systems demonstrate unique physicochemical properties, high therapeutics efficiency, and multimodal imaging ability. Biocompatibility and degradability are still remaining concerns. To overcome these limitations several soft materials such as liposome, polymeric particles, micelles, etc. have been proposed for cancer treatment on account of their biocompatibility, aqueous solubility, and high drug loading capacity [24]. Alongside, various morphologies of carbon based nanohybrids such as carbon nanodots, nanotubes, graphene oxide, graphene lipid composites etc. are being explored in medical applications such as sensing, drug delivery, gene delivery, tissue engineering etc. Major drawbacks with applications of soft and carbon-based materials are their poor stability, lack of NIR emission for deep tissue imaging and photothermal ability. On the other hand, lipid self-assembled liposomal nanoparticles have gained tremendous attention, but easy degradation is always a major concern for soft liposomes due to their fragile nature. Additionally, parent liposomes are limited with drug delivery application and reinforce their theranostics property when these platforms are functionalized with imaging and therapeutics molecules. A novel design of biodegradable NIR responsive graphene oxide nano-flakes-liposome nanocomposite has been studied for multifunctional cancer theranostics in vivo models recently. The supported emissive graphene oxide flakes (GOF) enhance the stability of fragile liposomal nanoparticles. Further, the exterior surface of graphene oxide flakes is easily available for targeting molecules functionalization named as folic acid targeting ligand for folate receptors. GOF-liposomal (GOF-Lipo) composite nanoparticles (size of ~200 nm) have been designed at ambient conditions which ensures (a) uniform coating of GOF (size of ~ 20 nm with ~ 1.5 nm thickness) over liposome, (b) uniform distribution and (c) specific architectural features that enhance their synergistic multifunctional ability. In addition, the designed system shows good aqueous solubility, biocompatibility, red emissive and NIR responsive photothermal property, specific bio-distribution, localized tumor diagnosis using single dose of nanocomposite with its successful combined chemo-photothermal therapy. The engineered theranostics system has been evaluated with better biocompatibility, stability, stimuli responsive drug delivery, targeted imaging, specific targeting ability for cancer cells/tumor, NIR responsive photothermal therapy and combined chemo-photothermal therapy for breast cancer cell lines. In their drug delivery application, the drug release response from nanocomposite is evaluated at pH 7.4 and pH 4 before and after NIR exposure. At a pH of 7.4, about 3 % of drug release is noted before NIR exposure which increases to ~ 30 % after NIR exposure. This is once again attributed to the degradation of engineered GOF-Lipo nano-composite owing to generated heat on NIR exposure. At a pH 4, a drug release of ~ 8 % is seen before the NIR exposure, while more than 40 % drug release is calculated after NIR exposure. The marginally higher release at pH4 as compared to pH 7.4 can be attributed higher disintegration of GOF-lipo composite on the combined effect of NIR and acidic pH [24].

On the other hand, a bio-responsive and degradable nanohybrid that is unsaturated red emissive carbon dots (C-dots) decorated liposomal nanohybrids has been designed and tested for localized tumor imaging and light-mediated tumor growth inhibition. Along with the emissive property, these attached QDs demonstrate heat response under NIR light exposure due to unsaturated carbonic framework. However, they also produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) that cause photo triggered cancer cell death and tumor regression. Photothermal and oxidative damage on solid tumor area have been noticed which is a major limitation of such therapeutics modality. The support of QDs helps in small molecules attachment like folic acid as targeting ligands. 200 nm of surface modified nanoparticles demonstrate better aqueous dispersibility, excellent photothermal response (62 °C in 5 minutes), good biocompatibility, and targeted cellular uptake (in 4 h). Site-selective tumor reduction without affecting the surrounding healthy tissues at minimum dose has been achieved under irradiation of 808 nm light. Next, plasmonic gold nanorods also improve the stability of soft liposomal nanoparticles. The gold nanorods supported liposomes demonstrate imaging guided photothermal therapy and chemotherapy of cancer cells. The engineered dual therapeutic gold nanorod-liposomes comprises of nanorods support and doxorubicin (DOX) anticancer chemotherapeutic drug loading. These supported gold nanorods not only serve as a photothermal agent and increase the drug release in intracellular environment of cancer cells, but also provide mechanical strength to liposomes by being decorated both inside and outside of bilayer surfaces mentioned in the Figure 5. The designed nanohybrid has been tested for synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy for breast cancer cell lines. In brief; prior to designing the gold nanorods-liposomal theranostics nanohybrid, gold nanorods have been prepared using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a structure-directing agent followed by seed-mediated growth procedure. Finally, the surface modified gold nanorods are introduced in the film hydration and sonication process to obtain self-assembly of lipid (1:9 mixture of dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and 1,2-distearoyl-sn- glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC) bilayers and surface modified nanorods that form the gold nanorods supported liposomal theranostics platform with ~170 nm size. In the photothermal transduction experiment, designed nanohybrid hyperthermia temperature (43 °C) in 5 min of NIR exposure time for 0.1 mg/mL of concentration. Further, better response in the temperature was recorded in 3 min for 0.2 mg/mL concentration and 53 °C in 5 min for 0.5 mg/mL at 1 W power.

Next, it should be noted that better colloidal stability, better blood circulation time, specific biodistribution and specific binding ability of any nanoparticles are essential parameters prior to use them in targeted cancer theranostics applications. These properties could be improved by coating the surface of nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol (PEG) known as PEGylation which reduces or hamper the adsorption of blood proteins over the surface of circulated nanoparticles in the blood stream. PEGylation makes nanoparticles stealth which is a widely explored approach in the area of nanomedicine. In 1977, PEGylation for drug delivery applications has been reported for the first time and in 1990 FDA approved the first PEGylated protein product for immunodeficiency disease. Overall, about 8 PEGylated protein therapeutics have been approved by FDA for biomedical applications. In the case of nanoparticle therapeutics, Doxil® is the first FDA approved PEGylated liposomal nanoparticle in 1995 which is loaded with anticancer drug doxorubicin. Doxil® demonstrates better bioavailability (90-folds) compared to free drug with a drug half-life of 72 h and circulation half-life of 36 h in one week of post-injection. Interestingly, PEGylation protects the surface of nanoparticles from opsonization and phagocytosis with better dispersion after systemic administration. It should be noted that PEGylation improves systemic blood circulation time and reduces the immunogenicity of the injected nanoparticles. Conjugated PEG chains and density improve the hydrophilic nature of nanoparticles that make hydrated cloud over nanoparticles core with a large omitted volume that strongly prevents the adsorption of blood components and proteins on the nanoparticle's surface. However, covering, density and molecular weight of PEGylated molecules alter the physicochemical and biological properties of nanoparticles.

 Figure 5 

(a) Schematics of silica coated gold nanoparticles as surface engineered nanotheranostics, (b) uptake of nanotheranostics in solid tumor environment, (c, d) microscopic image of the designed nanotheranostics and their in vitro radiocontrast performance, (e, f) silica coated gold nanorods theranostics agents for targeted tumor imaging and bio-distribution, (g, h) novel engineering of liposomal surface with red emissive graphene oxide flakes and their microscopic image, (i) in vivo photo transduction response under near infrared light exposure at various time points, (j) photo triggered drug delivery response of doxorubicin loaded graphene oxide-liposomal theranostics platform and (k-n) in vitro and in vivo targeted cells/tumor imaging and distribution using red emissive graphene oxide flakes coated liposomal theranostics system, (o-r) near infrared light mediated solid tumor ablation followed by chemo-photothermal therapy and compared with standalone chemotherapy using folic acid attached red emissive graphene oxide flakes coated liposomal theranostics system and (s,t) representation of a novel engineering of gold nanorods supported liposomal theranostics system, schematic and microscopic image. Reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 8, 3312, Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 12, 4012 and Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 5, 1510 published by American Chemical Society.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

Nanovalved theranostics systems

Premature leakage of loaded cargo molecules (imaging and therapeutic agents) from the designed nanotheranostics platforms is always a major issue. To prevent such premature release prior to reaching the target site, nanovalves/or nanogates have been decorated on the exterior surface of the theranostics where pores are opened. On the other hand, the nano-gated concept in theranostics systems has been evolved in the area of nanomedicine, where stimuli responsive controlled drug release can be triggered for improved and safe cancer therapies through zero or negligible premature release [75]. Nano-gates seal the pore opening of nanohybrid/theranostics to prevent the premature release of drug [75,80]. Surface modifications with various functionalities is used for controlled the drug release ass depicted in Figure 6 [75,80,81]. Pore are gated using bulky groups like supramolecules (nanovalve of cyclodextrin, aromatic amine, polymers, proteins, support of lipid layers) or nanoparticles, such as, carbon quantum dots, gold nanoparticles, iron oxide nanoparticles, etc [75,81]. These sealed gates either degrade or get detached on exposure of specific stimuli or to the cancer mimicked environment [81]. To date, various structures based nanohybrids such as light responsive plasmonic nanoparticles, superparamagnetic nanoparticles with responsiveness to magnetic fields, polymeric and liposomal based nanohybrids which are high-frequency ultrasound responsive, etc., have been thoroughly studied for remotely triggered drug release [75,81].

Another recent development in theranostics viz., a nanovalve gated mesoporous silica (MS) with stimuli responsive controlled drug delivery has required great attention. The exterior surface of MS is functionalized with other pore covering agents such as metal nanoparticles, graphene quantum dots, carbon nanodots etc. for preventing the premature drug leakage and for various stimuli responsive controlled drug delivery [75,81]. In that context, Sir F. Stoddart and J. Zink have conceptualized stimuli responsive supramolecular gatekeepers on mesoporous silica nanoparticles that respond to various stimuli such as light, temperature, pH and enzyme [81,82] among which individual stimuli, pH and redox-responsive release mechanisms have been recognized as effective ones [81].

 Figure 6 

Schematic illustration of nanovalve-gated multifunctional mesoporous silica theranostics systems for loading and release of Hoechst 33342 molecules. (a,b) loading of Hoechst 33342, (c) zoomed particle's surface before capping and washing, (d) loaded Hoechst 33342 molecules in pores after capping and washing, (e) release of Hoechst 33342 molecules from the pores, (g-i) loading of dye molecules in different pore sizes of the nanoparticles and (h) chemistry of Hoechst 33342 molecule adsorbed on the silica surface. Reproduced with permission from J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 19496 published by American Chemical Society.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

Stimuli responsive mesoporous silica

Various MS gated nanohybrids have been exploited for pH-responsive controlled drug delivery in cancer mimicked environment (pH ~ 2-4) [82,83]. MS as a cargo carrier is reported by Vallet-Regi et al. in 2001 for the first time [84]. Stimuli responsive release of guest molecules from MS is reported by Mal et al. in 2003 [85]. The MS nanoparticles are prepared by sol-gel process and N-(3-triethoxysilylpropyl-2-aminoethyl)-ethylenediamine is grafted on its exterior surface to obtain amine functionalized mesoporous nanohybrid [75]. In detail, anchored amine groups are deprotonated at high pH values and the delivery system goes to an “open gate” state [75,82]. However, at low pH conditions, amine groups repel to each other due to coulombic repulsion effect and cover the pore openings brining the delivery system to a “close gate” state [86].

In 2004, Sir F. Stoddart, J. Zink and coworkers have designed nano-gated mesoporous silica utilizing the recognition between surface-tethered naphthalene-containing secondary dialkylammonium ions and supramolecular gates (dibenzo[24]crown-8 (DB24C8) [86]. The loaded drug molecules from the pores of MS are released at various pH levels and the rate of cargo release is determined by the effect of electrostatic interactions and steric hindrance of the added salts. Similar concept is described by Kim and coworkers in 2007, where the pores are blocked by grafting a biocompatible version of pH-responsive polyethylene amine (PEI)/ cyclodextin (CD) polypseudorotaxanes [87]. In 2008, Sir Stoddart and Zink's groups have reported the first cucurbituril based supramolecular nanovalves on MS nanoparticles (bisammonium stalks and cucurbit [6] uril (CB6) rings) [88]. The successful operation of these nanovalves on mesoporous nanohybrids is observed under pH variation. The nanovalves operation depends on the ion-dipole interaction between CB6 and the bisammonium stalks as a function of pH values of an external environment. When pH values are neutral and acidic, CB6 rings close the bisammonium stalks tightly and results in the pore sealing of nanohybrid. However, the deprotonation of bisammonium stalks is noticed in basic environment (pH ~ 9-10). Hence, the pH-responsive supramolecular nanovalves play a significant role in cancer therapy due to the variation in pH values in cancer and normal cells in living systems.

Zink and coworkers have contributed significantly to studies on the pH-responsive cargo uptake and release in cancer mimicked environment using cyclodextin (CD) threaded phenylaminomethyl stalk based nanovalves as reported in 2011 [89]. It is shown that, the CDs encircle the stalks on the nanohybrid surface through hydrophobic interactions. On protonation in the stalks, CD gates/caps detach from the stalks and result in the pore opening in acidic condition (pH ~ 3-5). Similarly, other types of pore covering agents such as poly (methacrylic acid) (PMAA), lipid bilayer, metal complexes etc. are incorporated on the exterior surface of MS nanohybrids [86,90]. However, their poor aqueous solubility is a major concern for nanomedicine with the exception of few molecules such as lipid bilayer, CB (6) etc [90]. Recently (in 2018), cerium oxide nanoparticles gated mesoporous silica hybrids has been studied for pH trigger control drug release and intracellular drug delivery of anticancer drug doxorubicin [90]. Pore opening of carboxyl-functionalized mesoporous silica particles are gated with aminated cerium oxide nanoparticles (COP) where these pores are opened in acidic conditions to release the loaded drug as shown in Figure 7.

 Figure 7 

(a) Schematic representation of nanoceria capped drug loaded mesoporous silica for pH-triggered release with microscopic and elemental understanding. Reproduced with permission from ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 1, 288 published by American Chemical Society.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

Alternatively, more soluble, biocompatible and stable systems such as gold nanoparticles, graphene quantum dots/carbon quantum dots (GQDs/CQDs) are being recently explored as gate keepers (2013, 2014 and 2016) [75,91]. In a first such report in 2013, Qu and coworkers have attempted to cap the exterior surface of MS by CQDs and significant premature release (about 15 %) of anticancer drug, doxorubicin (DOX) is observed [92]. The issue of premature release of cargo molecules from MS has been later addressed to a larger extent by Fu and coworkers in 2014 using graphene quantum dots (GQDs) as caps [93]. No other literature is available on the design and testing of GQDs/CQDs as capping agents. Thus, there appears to be a huge scope for further improvements in pore sealing, prevent premature drug release and aqueous solubility of MS based systems capped by the above agents. These limited reports further suggest that the inconsistency between pore diameter of MS and size of CQDs/GQDs results in loosely sealed pores attributing to the premature drug release. A part of the present thesis attempts to discuss a successful design of a MS based bio responsive multifunctional theranostics system with tightly sealed pores by fluorescent CQDs/GQDs [91]. The concept of fluorescent nano-gate on mesoporous silica and its controlled drug delivery response in cancer mimicked environment is reported (2016) as a consequence that solves the solubility problem and sophisticated stimuli responsive mechanism of macromolecular nanovalve for drug delivery [91]. Mechanized mesoporous silica nanoparticle with supramolecular nanovalves have been widely studied for controlled cargo/drug release response as shown in Figure 8. This is believed to provide a new direction for stimuli responsive nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.

 Figure 8 

Schematic illustration of stimuli responsive nanovalve-gates on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. (a-c) cyclodextrin gated mesoporous silica surface and their cargo release pattern reproduced with permission from ACS Nano 2015, 9, 11, 10778 published by American Chemical Society, (d-g) cross-linked network on mesoporous silica nanoparticles and molecular design of sodium alginate (SA) along with release kinetics and microscopic images, reproduced from Front. Chem. 7:59. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00059 an open-access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), (h-j) nanopiston mechanism of phosphonate covered mesoporous silica through acid-cleavable acetal bond, reproduced with permission from J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 37, 13016 published by American Chemical Society.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

Next, many diseases are related to redox homeostasis in the human body and cancer being the deadliest one [88]. Importantly, redox homeostasis is also responsible for atherosclerosis, heart diseases and chronic diseases of major internal organs. Thus, it is significantly important to design a redox-responsive cancer theranostics system for the intracellular transport of drugs. Further, the continuous progress and successful therapeutic outcomes in redox responsive nanohybrids are reported. In 2003, Lin and coworkers have designed cadmium sulfide (CdS) decorated MS nanoparticles as a first redox-responsive drug delivery system [94]. In detail, the pores of drug loaded MS are covalently capped by mercaptoacetic acid functionalized CdS nanocrystals through 2-(propyldisulfanyl) ethylamine linker. Prevention of premature drug release from this system for a long time has been observed under normal physiological conditions. However, the disulfide linkages between the MS surface and CdS nanoparticles could be cleaved in the presence of various disulfide-reducing agents, such as glutathione (GSH, 2-20 mM), dithiothreitol (DTT) and mercaptoethanol (ME) [82,91,94]. Along the same lines, Lin and coworkers have also designed superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4) gated MS nanohybrid as a stimuli-responsive controlled drug delivery system [95]. The disulfide linkages between the MS surface and Fe3O4 nanoparticles could be cleaved with above mentioned disulfide-reducing agents to implement successful redox-responsive controlled drug release. The above mentioned site-specific magnetic nanohybrids can also be attractive for the development of targeted and controlled drug delivery in intracellular environment opening a new direction for site-selective controlled drug delivery devices and nano biosensors.

Zink's group developed macromolecule based redox responsive gatekeepers in 2004 [86]. These gates are related to tethered 1, 5-dioxynaphthalene (DNP)-containing derivative (DNPD) that is decorated on the MS surface and cyclobis-(paraquat-p-phenylene) (CBPQT4+) which identify the DNP units through non-covalent interactions. The specific signal for pore opening is from an external reducing reagent (NaCNBH3) which operates the nanovalve and permits the control release of cargo molecules. Subsequently, the pseudorotaxane based gatekeepers are developed by same group through a fabrication of a bistable, reversible redox-responsive nano-switch on MS exterior surface [96]. The nano-switch is controlled with mild redox reagents and relied on the sliding of gated rings on the bistable thread. A polymeric gated MS based redox system is reported by Feng et al. in 2008 for the first time [97]. The cross-linked polymeric network on MS surface is worked as a redox responsive nano-switch where poly (N-acryloxysuccinimide) is attached on the exterior of MS pore through cystamine linking a disulfide-based bifunctional primary amine that could respond in GSH, DTT, ME, environment as explained in Figure 9. In 2009, Wang et al. has reported aptamer functionalized polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEM)-coated MS nanohybrids as a targeted controlled drug delivery system [98]. These layers cover the MS pore opening and deliver the drug in cytosolic space. Cyclodextrins are also preferred to modify the exterior surface of MS with the various disulfide linkers that could prevent the premature release of the loaded drugs but leading to controlled drug delivery performance in the cytosolic space [98]. In 2012, Li et al. introduced GSH responsive disulfide bond containing PEG modified MS nanohybrid as controlled drug release system [99]. In summary, the redox-responsive gates on the surface of MS based nanohybrids are widely explored in controlled drug delivery applications.

 Figure 9 

(a-e) Schematic illustration of operation of nanovalves gating the pore openings on silica particles in various stimuli conditions reproduced with permission from Theranostics 2019, 9, 3341, doi: 10.7150/thno.34576 open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license published by IVYSPRING.

Nanotheranostics Image

(View in new window)

On the other hand, the above two discussed stimuli responsive systems are basically designed for controlled drug delivery in intracellular environment. A nano-gate operation on MS surface could also be controlled through external stimuli viz., light exposure and these systems are in high demand as controlled drug delivery devices. Light irradiation can control the distribution and release of drug molecules from cargo carriers in cancer mimicked environment. The generated heat by photothermal agent during light exposure operates the nano-gates on MS surface. Tanaka and coworkers reported the light responsive coumarin modified MS nanohybrid for the first time [100]. Designed system reveals the controlled release of drug via light responsive reversible intermolecular dimerization of coumarin derivatives on MS surface. Photosensitive coumarin blocks the MS pores through photodimerization of cyclobutane dimers under 310 nm light exposure. The cleavage of cyclobutane rings is observed during 250 nm UV light exposure that led to the pore opening of MS nanohybrid. Interestingly, various stalk and ring components (pseudorotaxanes approach) are also applied to understand the control drug delivery with light. In 2009, for the first time, Sir Stoddart and coworkers fabricated a controlled drug delivery vehicle that is based on photo responsive pseudo rotaxane of azobenzene (AB) derivative and β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) [101]. The exterior surface of MS is grafted with pseudo rotaxane stalks viz., 4-(3-triethoxylsilyl propylureido) azobenzene (TSUA) groups or more water-soluble (E)-4-((4-(benzylcarbamoyl) phenyl)diazenyl) benzoic acid groups. Under the irradiation of 351 nm light, both azobenzene derivatives isomerize from the more stable trans form to a less stable cis form and then β-CD or fluorescently labeled pyrene-β-cyclodextrin (Py-β-CD) are introduced. The strong binding ability between trans-AB and β-CD locks the β-CD rings of MS surface. On the other hand, owing to the weak binding affinity between cis-AB and β-CD, the isomerization of trans- to cis-AB stalks leads to the dissociation of pseudorotaxanes and thus allowing the release of cargo molecules from carrier system. These CD based gates are applied by several groups after the demonstration by Zink and Sir Stoddart [88,90,96].

Photosensitive cleavable thymine-based nano-gates are conceptualized in 2012 where 365 nm UV light irradiation results in the formation of cyclobutane dimer and then block the pores whereas on a 240 nm light irradiation, the pores are opened due to photocleavage of cyclobutane dimer and entrapped drug is released from the carrier system [102]. Similarly, continuous progress has been reported on light mediated controlled drug delivery by various nanohybrids such as, up-conversion nanohybrid, silica coated gold nanorods, NIR dye loaded lipid, silica, polymeric nanoparticles, etc. The NIR responsive metal nanoparticles (800-900 nm wavelength) encapsulated MS nanohybrids for near-infrared (NIR) light mediated controlled drug delivery is a recent development in nanomedicine and these studies are reported from 2010 onwards [16-18,103]. A noteworthy report in this context demonstrate an azobenzene gated mechanism by using MS coated NaYF4:Tm, YbNaYF4 nanohybrids under 980 nm light exposure [104]. The released drug amount could be controlled through varying the intensity or exposure duration of NIR light [103].

Several other NIR active systems with internal photothermal heating by plasmonic nanoparticles, photodimerizations (cis-trans conversion) have been reported for controlled release of drugs or dyes [106]. Focus has been on designing nano-gated light mediated systems for site specific localized treatment avoiding the irradiation of surrounding healthy tissues [75,82]. In 2014, MS coated gold nanorods gated with sulfonatocalix[4]arene (SC[4]A)/quaternary ammonium supramolecular switches have been designed as a novel cancer theranostic platform [103].

Through a supramolecular host-guest interaction these nanovalves close the pore opening of the nanohybrid. The internal heating generated by gold nanorods under NIR light exposure decreases the host-guest binding affinity so that SC[4]A rings dissociate from the stalks on the exterior surfaces thereby allowing the pore opening for release of trapped cargo molecules.

Among the light responsive techniques, UV light responsive method shows various side effects on healthy tissues due to its poor penetration ability [107]. NIR light responsive controlled drug delivery systems have several advantages over the above as well as the other stimuli responsive approaches. Controlled switching gated operation for controlled delivery, low side effects, specific distribution of drug molecules in site location, etc are few of the advantages [34,64]. Additionally, these find significant importance in nanomedicine due to its ability to deeply penetrate without tissue damage and its good photothermal response for controlled delivery of drugs through open and close gated mechanism [105,108].

In a living body the presence of tumors, inflammation and any type of infection can cause an increase in the temperature of the whole body by up to 4-5 °C. Hence, it is advantageous to design a temperature responsive drug delivery system that only releases drugs at temperatures above 37 °C [109]. The modification of MS surface with temperature responsive nano-switch makes it to be a stimuli responsive controlled drug/dye delivery system. So far, poly-N-isopropylacrylamide (PNIPAM) and its derivatives are widely used temperature sensitive gatekeepers on MS surface [109]. More recently, Yang's group has designed the thermo responsive core-shell magnetic MS nanohybrid where Fe3O4 nanoparticles are in cores and the exterior MS surface is functionalized with cross-linked thermosensitive (PNIPAM, PNIPAM-co-NHMA) copolymer [110]. A controlled drug release is noticed below the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of these polymers where they exhibit a hydrophilic extended state. PNIPAM is functionalized on the internal surface of the MS through atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) as reported by Lopez and coworkers, who claimed that the PNIPAM-functionalized MS can release the drug molecules at a high temperature (50 °C) and hinder the drug release at low temperature (25 °C) [109]. A thiol-functionalized polymeric gated MS surface with pyridyl disulfide-terminated poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM-S-S-Py) is examined by Oupický et al [111]. The polymer gate is in the random coil formation at room temperature (below the LCST of the polymer) which results in the release of loaded cargo molecules at the same temperature.

Interestingly, Wang, Cui and coworkers have reported dual stimuli responsive (pH and thermal) copolymer-lipid bilayer-coated MS drug delivery system in 2013 [112]. The designed system contains natural phospholipids (soyphosphatidylcholine, SPC) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-methacrylic acid-octadecyl acrylate) copolymer (p(NIPAM-MAAODA)) with a phase transition temperature of 42 °C and maximum DOX release (54 %) is observed at 42 °C that is five times larger with compared release at 25 °C temperature. Similarly, many more temperature responsive nano-gated systems have been designed and their successful controlled drug release performances are reported by several research groups [113].

State of art in nanotheranostics area

Various nano sized formulations for biomedical applications are known. Several multimodal imaging agents and therapeutic probes are well studied for molecular imaging and therapies. These imaging and therapeutic systems for medical applications are well explored individually. Among them, a few have reached clinical trials, but are struggling with FDA approval. Stimulatingly, selective surface engineering can influence the specific design of theranostics systems which make them suitable for targeted diagnosis and therapeutics in pre-clinical and clinical models. On the other hand, reliability and reproducibility are major issues which can be resolved by using numerous synthesis methods such as top-down, sol-gel, solvothermal, hydrothermal, surfactants assisted, seed mediated growth, post-graft, etc. In fact, it is the choice of synthesis method which can produce a multifunctional theranostics system with controlled sizes and shapes. The role of various characteristics such as, size, shape, surface chemistry, framework, composition, physicochemical property, etc. of these systems on the theranostics performance have been understood by using modern techniques.

Although the chemistry and biomedical applications of various nano sized systems are known since past few decades, there are several major concerns that need to be answered/addressed such as:

1. Knowledge on how to control the size and shape of nano sized imaging and therapeutic agents is not fully understood. Their surface chemistry and boundary between inorganic core and stabilizing agents/capping agents at nanoscopic level are poorly understood so far. For example, the organic soft moieties on metal surface and their architecture are not visualizable through microscopic techniques (TEM, SEM, AFM, STEM etc.).

2. The formation of specific size distributed nanoparticles such as gold nanoparticles (nanorods), mesoporous silica, graphene oxide flakes on liposomal surface, quantum dots on liposomal surface, gold nanorods on liposomal surface, etc. their mechanism and surface chemistry are less understood.

3. Similarly, the various modes and details of the interaction between two (metallic and nonmetallic) components are not known fully.

4. The nanoparticle's cross talk with cancer cells is less understood.

5. Rapid and scalable production of imaging and therapeutic systems with high product yield is highly challenging.

6. Understanding the theranostics performance (specific site location, high cargo capacity, photothermal conversion efficiency, etc.) of multifunctional systems is inadequate but important.

The present article covers the review of progress and recent developments in nanotheranostics for targeted diagnosis and treatment of cancer. So far various organic and inorganic hybrid nanomaterials have been tried for multifunctional cancer theranostics applications. However, biodegradation, biocompatibility, aqueous solubility, photostability, low cargo capacity, poor theranostics performance are major concerns in nanomedicine. This review represents a step towards the choice of advanced multifunctional theranostics systems for cancer diagnosis and therapeutics. Various parameters related to nanotheranostics such as rapid and scalable design of nanohybrids, biodegradation ability, enhanced biocompatibility, high surface area, high cargo capacity, enhanced theranostics performance, good water solubility, specific targeting ability as well as bio-distribution have been addressed. This includes the attempt for a simple design of multifunctional nanohybrids by integrating multimodal diagnostics agents (X-ray CT and fluorescence), chemotherapeutic anti-cancer drug) and photothermal agents in a single system. In addition, the issues of surface modification, their role on enhanced theranostics performance and combined chemo-photothermal therapeutic efficiency of various designed systems are addressed.

For example, plasmonic gold nanorods are prepared by using CTAB surfactant as a structure directing agent, but its shows high toxicity. Hence, the direct use of gold nanorods are prohibited in cancer theranostics applications. Therefore, silica coating has been proposed to overcome this limitation, but the effective distribution of nanorods in silica is a major challenge. On the other hand, scalable and rapid process with highest surface area and cargo capacity and preventing premature release of loaded cargo are another demanding parameters for gold-silica based nanotheranostics. The prevention of premature release of loaded cargo and their stimuli responsive controlled release have been achieved nano-gates which are decorated on the exterior surface of mesoporous silica particles. Now, major concern is biodegradation, therefore, surface engineered liposomal systems have been proposed as biodegradable theranostics. There is ample scope of further research and development in fabrication of nanotheranostics systems having complete biodegradability in a given time frame and having all the above desired properties. More importantly these desirable multifunctionalities have been discussed in this article.

Nanoparticles for solid tumors “entry and exit”

After successful design of nanoparticles or nanotheranostics, their interaction with cancer cells and solid tumors have become essential for pre-clinical and clinical trials [114]. Over the years, nanoparticles and solid tumor theranostics have opened various questions regarding the interaction, biodistributions, site specific binding, easy penetration and strong retention, tumor entry and exit, and biodegradation [115,116]. Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is the central dogma for nanoparticles accumulation in tumor environment. The concept of nanoparticles entry or accumulation followed by passive way in tumor microenvironment was established in 1986 by Jain and Maeda's groups. Diffusion is a widely accepted mechanism for nanoparticle's entry and distribution in tumors. 0.7% of the injected dose of nanoparticles has been reported in the literature in case of their entry in solid tumors [117]. Moreover, nanoparticle's ability for passing through blood vessels into the tumor microenvironment indicates towards their successful entry into solid tumors. Surface engineering, size, shape, charge, stimuli interventions, saturating macrophage and Kupffer cells can improve their entry or accumulation but not significant [118]. So far, researchers have designed nanoparticles for passive entry into solid tumor blood vessels through open gaps (up to 2000 nm) between endothelial cells which can be achieved by altering the nanoparticle size and shape [119]. However, nanoparticle's transportation into the tumor blood vessels through the endothelial cells has also been reported recently [119]. It should be noted that there are 26 gaps among 313 blood vessels throughout the solid tumor environment. Moreover, interfacial understanding between nanoparticles and the tumor endothelium can give us clarity on the entry mechanism which can also answer for whether all endothelial cells involved in nanoparticle's transportation. Recently, warren and Weissleder's group explained that tumor-associated macrophages uptake nanoparticles upon passing through the tumor blood vessels and distribute them in the tumor microenvironment [120]. They have noticed that tumor-associated macrophages aggressively migrate toward nanoparticles belched from the leaky blood vessels and engulfed them for further redistribution in heterogeneous tumor microenvironment. Remarkably, it has been investigated that these macrophages can carry nanoparticles 2-5 times deeper in the tumor than passive diffusion. But, the question is how many nanoparticles will they transport? Further, these macrophages respond to nanoparticles according to their size [120]. On the other hand, lymphatic vessels within or surrounding the tumor help nanoparticles exit from the tumor environment which depends on the nanoparticle size [121]. Recently, it has been reported that exit nanoparticles from the tumor again returned to the blood system which allow them to recirculate and interact with the solid tumor for the second pass.

Conclusion and future perspective

In summary, various examples of surface engineered nanoparticles (metallic and nonmetallic) which received tremendous attention for targeted imaging, multimode therapeutics and drug delivery have been discussed here. Further, the clinical relevance of nanoparticles-based cancer theranostics systems with current demand have been highlighted in detail. However, choosing metallic or nonmetallic components for engineering nanotheranostics agents is an always concern. Herein, we have reviewed various design of theranostics nanoparticles such as gold nanoparticles (rod shaped), silica particles, liposomal hybrids, graphene oxide flakes, quantum dots etc., followed by surface coating and nanovalved approaches. For example, graphene oxide flakes-liposomal theranostics has been designed through surface coating method and tested for imaging and anticancer activity in in vivo tumor models. On the other hand, quantum dots/or nanoparticles decorated mesoporous silica theranostics have been designed through nanovalved method and tested for targeted imaging and therapeutics of cancer. Engineered systems from both approaches demonstrate significant theranostics response in pre-clinical models. However, silica based theranostics system suffer with slow biodegradation and metabolism whereas graphene oxide flakes-liposomal theranostics face major issues of complicated engineering, uncontrolled drug release and rapid degradation. Hence, it is a major concern on the choice of theranostics system for pre-clinical validation. Hence, the choice of nanoparticles for theranostics engineering and associated challenges have been highlighted in the present article. In addition, the key requirements to design multifunctional theranostics and its limitations have also been highlighted here. Further, the various designs of stimuli (viz., redox, light, pH, thermal, etc.) responsive nano-gated systems with various supramolecular and molecular switches are reviewed in detail. Whole a significantly remarkable progress and contribution towards biocompatible design of multifunctional nanohybrids for cancer theranostics is visible, several issues on their successful parameters along with minimal cytotoxicity are yet to be understood and resolved. Overall, we have mentioned detailed information on understanding the design of multifunctional nanohybrids for cancer diagnosis and therapeutic applications. So far, iodinated contrast agents are commonly used imaging probe for diagnosis, but these contrasts show several allergic issues, nephrotoxicity, rapid clearance (less than 10 min.), nonspecific bio-distribution, lack of surface functionalization etc. However, these contrast agents require permanent replacement with some good biocompatible contrast agents. To overcome this issue various shapes of gold nanoparticles are heavily used as contrast agent for diagnosis and their good biocompatibility is recognized recently. Due to specific optical property, good contrast ability (brightness and radio density) these gold nanoparticles can be applicable for human trials in the near future.

On other side, mesoporous silica (MS) has been considered as a safe material for drug delivery due to its high surface area, high cargo capacity, easy to surface functionalization, good biocompatibility etc. The MS based carrier system can deliver the diagnostics and therapeutics agents at the targeted site which can solve the problem for specific distribution of several drug molecules and specific tumor diagnosis. Due to good biocompatibility of silica, few silica based nano sized hybrids are in clinical applications. Thus, the chances of MS can be approved for human trials because of its high cargo capacity, biocompatibility, and Sir F. Stoddart's (Nobel Prize in Chemistry, 2016) and J. Zink's nano-gated concept for stimuli responsive controlled drug delivery at targeted tumor sits. In addition, several formulations of soft materials are in clinical trials (liposomal nanohybrids with drug encapsulations) but these systems are far from their multifunctional performance. Further, near-infra red (NIR) light responsive photodynamic therapy is known for clinical applications. However, biodegradation, red emissive nature, NIR responsive, multifunctional ability of nano sized hybrids materials can be considered for new demand for clinical practice. Moreover, here a new design of red emissive and NIR responsive multifunctional nano sized system for cancer theranostics applications has been discussed. The designed system is further biodegradable in nature under therapeutics command. Thus, the designed nanocomposite can be considered as clinical relevant material for further Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and its clinical applications. Finally, the impact of nanotechnology on cancer diagnosis and therapies has been covered in this article. The designed each nanohybrid/composite system has advanced concept for new developments in nanomedicine and shows their capability for cancer nanomedicine and can solve the various issues of oncology.


Dr. Rajendra Prasad thanks the director and the school of biochemical engineering IIT-BHU, Varanasi, U.P., for encouraging and providing the necessary facilities and support. The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Sailaja Krishnamurty for giving good suggestions to improve the manuscript. Dr. Rajendra thanks to Dr. Berney Peng, UCLA for his suggestions. Dr. Selvaraj thank the support by the grants under projects OLP002626 and GAP313626 (CSIR, Delhi). We have cited reused references and images, and any types of data used in the form of table, list etc.


Rajendra Prasad: 0000-0001-9851-8630

Kaliaperumal Selvaraj: 0000-0002-9996-8112

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.


1. von Maltzahn G, Park JH, Agrawal A, Bandaru NK, Das SK, Sailor MJ, Bhatia SN. Computationally guided photothermal tumor therapy using long-circulating gold nanorod antennas. Cancer Res. 2009;69:3892

2. Cheng Y, C Samia A, Meyers JD, Panagopoulos I, Fei B, Burda C. Highly efficient drug delivery with gold nanoparticle vectors for in vivo photodynamic therapy of cancer. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10643-7

3. Nam J, Won N, Jin H, Chung H, Kim S. pH-induced aggregation of gold nanoparticles for photothermal cancer therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:13639-45

4. Croissant J, Zink JI. Nanovalve-controlled cargo release activated by plasmonic heating. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:7628-31

5. Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2009;3:16-20

6. Shi J, Votruba AR, Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Nanotechnology in drug delivery and tissue engineering: from discovery to applications. Nano Lett. 2010;10:3223-30

7. Chen YS, Frey W, Kim S, Kruizinga P, Homan K, Emelianov S. Silica-coated gold nanorods as photoacoustic signal nanoamplifiers. Nano Lett. 2011;11:348-54

8. Zhang Z, Wang L, Wang J, Jiang X, Li X, Hu Z, Ji Y, Wu X, Chen C. Mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods as a light-mediated multifunctional theranostic platform for cancer treatment. Adv Mater. 2012;24:1418-23

9. Prasad R, Jain NK, Conde J, Srivastava R. Localized nanotheranostics: recent developments in cancer nanomedicine. Mat Today Adv. 2020;8:100087

10. Zhao Y, Trewyn BG, Slowing II, Lin VS. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-based double drug delivery system for glucose-responsive controlled release of insulin and cyclic AMP. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:8398-400

11. Pallares RM, Mottaghy FM, Schulz V, Kiessling F, Lammers T. Nanoparticle Diagnostics and Theranostics in the Clinic. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:1802-1808

12. Janjua TI, Cao Y, Yu C, Popat A. Clinical translation of silica nanoparticles. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6:1072-1074

13. Slowing I, Trewyn BG, Lin VS. Effect of surface functionalization of MCM-41-type mesoporous silica nanoparticles on the endocytosis by human cancer cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:14792-3

14. Han YF, Chen F, Zhong Z, Ramesh K, Chen L, Widjaja E. Controlled synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties of Mn(2)O(3) and Mn(3)O(4) nanoparticles supported on mesoporous silica SBA-15. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:24450-6

15. Lin YS, Tsai CP, Huang HY, Kuo CT, Hung Y, Huang DM, Chen YC, Mou CY. Mesostructured Silica for Optical Functionality, Nanomachines, and Drug Delivery. Chem. Mater. 2007;17:4570

16. Huang P, Bao L, Zhang C, Lin J, Luo T, Yang D, He M, Li Z, Gao G, Gao B, Fu S, Cui D. Folic acid-conjugated silica-modified gold nanorods for X-ray/CT imaging-guided dual-mode radiation and photo-thermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2011;32:9796-809

17. Yang X, Liu X, Liu Z, Pu F, Ren J, Qu X. Near-infrared light-triggered, targeted drug delivery to cancer cells by aptamer gated nanovehicles. Adv Mater. 2012;24:2890-5

18. Chang YT, Liao PY, Sheu HS, Tseng YJ, Cheng FY, Yeh CS. Near-infrared light-responsive intracellular drug and siRNA release using Au nanoensembles with oligonucleotide-capped silica shell. Adv Mater. 2012;24:3309-14

19. Murphy CJ, Gole AM, Stone JW, Sisco PN, Alkilany AM, Goldsmith EC, Baxter SC. Gold nanoparticles in biology: beyond toxicity to cellular imaging. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1721-30

20. Cong H, Toftegaard R, Arnbjerg J, Ogilby PR. Silica-coated gold nanorods with a gold overcoat: controlling optical properties by controlling the dimensions of a gold-silica-gold layered nanoparticle. Langmuir. 2010;26:4188-95

21. Liu W, Zhu Z, Deng K, Li Z, Zhou Y, Qiu H, Gao Y, Che S, Tang Z. Gold nanorod@chiral mesoporous silica core-shell nanoparticles with unique optical properties. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:9659-64

22. Shen S, Tang H, Zhang X, Ren J, Pang Z, Wang D, Gao H, Qian Y, Jiang X, Yang W. Targeting mesoporous silica-encapsulated gold nanorods for chemo-photothermal therapy with near-infrared radiation. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3150-8

23. Prasad R, Agawane SB, Chauhan DS, Srivastava R, Selvaraj K. In Vivo Examination of Folic Acid-Conjugated Gold-Silica Nanohybrids as Contrast Agents for Localized Tumor Diagnosis and Biodistribution. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29:4012-4019

24. Prasad R, Yadav AS, Gorain M, Chauhan DS, Kundu GC, Srivastava R, Selvaraj K. Graphene Oxide Supported Liposomes as Red Emissive Theranostics for Phototriggered Tissue Visualization and Tumor Regression. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2:3312-3320

25. Lee JE, Lee N, Kim T, Kim J, Hyeon T. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanocomposite nanoparticles for theranostic applications. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:893-902

26. Bentzen SM. Preventing or reducing late side effects of radiation therapy: radiobiology meets molecular pathology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:702-13

27. Cairns R, Papandreou I, Denko N. Overcoming physiologic barriers to cancer treatment by molecularly targeting the tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer Res. 2006;4:61-70

28. Lammers T, Kiessling F, Hennink WE, Storm G. Nanotheranostics and image-guided drug delivery: current concepts and future directions. Mol Pharm. 2010;7:1899-912

29. Loeffler JS, Durante M. Charged particle therapy-optimization, challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:411-24

30. Woodcock J, Woosley R. The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:1-12

31. Kobler J, Möller K, Bein T. Colloidal suspensions of functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2008;2:791-9

32. Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VS, Wang K. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:295-300

33. Lee S, Chen X. Dual-modality probes for in vivo molecular imaging. Mol Imaging. 2009;8:87-100

34. Xie J, Liu G, Eden HS, Ai H, Chen X. Surface-engineered magnetic nanoparticle platforms for cancer imaging and therapy. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:883-92

35. Lee N, Choi SH, Hyeon T. Nano-sized CT contrast agents. Adv Mater. 2013;25:2641-60

36. Kobayashi H, Brechbiel MW. Nano-sized MRI contrast agents with dendrimer cores. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:2271-86

37. Slowing II, Vivero-Escoto JL, Wu CW, Lin VS. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1278-1288

38. Vivero-Escoto JL, Slowing II, Trewyn BG, Lin VS. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular controlled drug delivery. Small. 2010;6:1952-67

39. Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VS, Wang K. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:295-300

40. Rosenholm JM, Sahlgren C, Lindén M. Towards multifunctional, targeted drug delivery systems using mesoporous silica nanoparticles-opportunities & challenges. Nanoscale. 2010;2:1870-83

41. Radu DR, Lai CY, Jeftinija K, Rowe EW, Jeftinija S, Lin VS. A polyamidoamine dendrimer-capped mesoporous silica nanosphere-based gene transfection reagent. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:13216-7

42. Munoz B, Ramila A, Perez-Pariente J, Diaz I, Regi MV. MCM-41 organic modification as drug delivery rate regulator. Chem Mater. 2003;15:500

43. Nayak S, Lee H, Chmielewski J, Lyon LA. Folate-mediated cell targeting and cytotoxicity using thermoresponsive microgels. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:10258-9

44. Rosenholm JM, Meinander A, Peuhu E, Niemi R, Eriksson JE, Sahlgren C, Lindén M. Targeting of porous hybrid silica nanoparticles to cancer cells. ACS Nano. 2009;3:197-206

45. Brannon-Peppas L, Blanchette JO. Nanoparticle and targeted systems for cancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:1649-59

46. Huang H, Wang D, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Geng J, Chitgupi U, Cook TR, Xia J, Lovell JF. Axial PEGylation of Tin Octabutoxy Naphthalocyanine Extends Blood Circulation for Photoacoustic Vascular Imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:1574-8

47. Low PS, Henne WA, Doorneweerd DD. Discovery and development of folic-acid-based receptor targeting for imaging and therapy of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:120-9

48. Lu Y, Low PS. Folate-mediated delivery of macromolecular anticancer therapeutic agents. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:675-93

49. Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign LM. PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;99:28-51

50. Zhang X, Meng L, Lu Q, Fei Z, Dyson PJ. Targeted delivery and controlled release of doxorubicin to cancer cells using modified single wall carbon nanotubes. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6041-7

51. Liaw J, Taylor J, Goh V. Radiotherapy in practice-imaging. Oxford, UK: Oxford Academic. 2010

52. Shen G, Mao HK. High-pressure studies with x-rays using diamond anvil cells. Reports on progress in Physics. 2016;80:16

53. Zhao W, Li Y, Yang S, Chen Y, Zheng J, Liu C, Qing Z, Li J, Yang R. Target-Activated Modulation of Dual-Color and Two-Photon Fluorescence of Graphene Quantum Dots for in Vivo Imaging of Hydrogen Peroxide. Anal Chem. 2016;88:4833-40

54. Padmanabhan P, Kumar A, Kumar S, Chaudhary RK, Gulyás B. Nanoparticles in practice for molecular-imaging applications: An overview. Acta Biomater. 2016;41:1-16

55. Gu J, Fan W, Shimojima A, Okubo T. Organic-inorganic mesoporous nanocarriers integrated with biogenic ligands. Small. 2007;3:1740-4

56. Pasqua L, Testa F, Aiello R, Cundari S, Nagy JB. Preparation of bifunctional hybrid mesoporous silica potentially useful for drug targeting. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007;103:166-173

57. Schwartzberg AM, Olson TY, Talley CE, Zhang JZ. Synthesis, characterization, and tunable optical properties of hollow gold nanospheres. J Phys Chem B. 2006;110:19935-44

58. El-Sayed IH, Huang X, El-Sayed MA. Surface plasmon resonance scattering and absorption of anti-EGFR antibody conjugated gold nanoparticles in cancer diagnostics: applications in oral cancer. Nano Lett. 200; 5: 829-34.

59. Huang X, El-Sayed IH, Qian W, El-Sayed MA. Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:2115-20

60. Diagaradjane P, Shetty A, Wang JC, Elliott AM, Schwartz J, Shentu S, Park HC, Deorukhkar A, Stafford RJ, Cho SH, Tunnell JW, Hazle JD, Krishnan S. Modulation of in vivo tumor radiation response via gold nanoshell-mediated vascular-focused hyperthermia: characterizing an integrated antihypoxic and localized vascular disrupting targeting strategy. Nano Lett. 2008;8:1492-500

61. Jiang Y, Fei W, Cen X, Tang Y, Liang X. Near-infrared Light Activatable Multimodal Gold Nanostructures Platform: An Emerging Paradigm for Cancer Therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2015;15:406-22

62. Athar M, Das AJ. Therapeutic nanoparticles: State-of-the-art of nanomedicine. Adv. Mater. Rev. 2014;1:25

63. Sardan M, Ozkan AD, Zengin A, Tekinay AB, Guler MO. Advances in nanoparticle-based medical diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Therapeutic Nanomaterials. 2016;6:197

64. Chen NT, Tang KC, Chung MF, Cheng SH, Huang CM, Chu CH, Chou PT, Souris JS, Chen CT, Mou CY, Lo LW. Enhanced plasmonic resonance energy transfer in mesoporous silica-encased gold nanorod for two-photon-activated photodynamic therapy. Theranostics. 2014;4:798-807

65. Lal S, Clare SE, Halas NJ. Nanoshell-enabled photothermal cancer therapy: impending clinical impact. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1842-51

66. Gad SC, Sharp KL, Montgomery C, Payne JD, Goodrich GP. Evaluation of the toxicity of intravenous delivery of auroshell particles (gold-silica nanoshells). Int J Toxicol. 2012;31:584-94

67. Cole JR, Mirin NA, Knight MW, Goodrich GP, Halas NJ. Photothermal efficiencies of nanoshells and nanorods for clinical therapeutic applications. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2009;113:12090-12094

68. Barenholz Y. Doxil®-the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned. J Control Release. 2012;160:117-34

69. Bobo D, Robinson KJ, Islam J, Thurecht KJ, Corrie SR. Nanoparticle-Based Medicines: A Review of FDA-Approved Materials and Clinical Trials to Date. Pharm Res. 2016;33:2373-87

70. Meirow D, Nugent D. The effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7:535-43

71. Kawasaki ES, Player A. Nanotechnology, nanomedicine, and the development of new, effective therapies for cancer. Nanomedicine. 2005;1:101-9

72. Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects. FASEB J. 2005;19:311-30

73. Liu TM, Conde J, Lipiński T, Bednarkiewicz A, Huang CC. Revisiting the classification of NIR-absorbing/emitting nanomaterials for in vivo bioapplications. NPG Asia Mater. 2016;8:e295

74. Yang K, Feng L, Shi X, Liu Z. Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:530-47

75. Sun R, Wang W, Wen Y, Zhang X. Recent Advance on Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles-Based Controlled Release System: Intelligent Switches Open up New Horizon. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2015;5:2019-2053

76. Dreaden EC, Alkilany AM, Huang X, Murphy CJ, El-Sayed MA. The golden age: gold nanoparticles for biomedicine. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:2740-79

77. Chen M, Kim YN, Lee HM, Li C, Cho SO. Multifunctional magnetic silver nanoshells with sandwichlike nanostructures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112:8870-4

78. Resch-Genger U, Grabolle M, Cavaliere-Jaricot S, Nitschke R, Nann T. Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nature methods. 2008;5:763-75

79. Chen Y, Chen H, Shi J. In vivo bio-safety evaluations and diagnostic/therapeutic applications of chemically designed mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Advanced Materials. 2013;25:3144-76

80. Chen T, Yang N, Fu J. Controlled release of cargo molecules from hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles based on acid and base dual-responsive cucurbit [7] uril pseudorotaxanes. Chemical Communications. 2013;49:6555-7

81. Song N, Yang YW. Molecular and supramolecular switches on mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015;44:3474-504

82. Du L, Liao S, Khatib HA, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. Controlled-access hollow mechanized silica nanocontainers. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:15136-42

83. Zhao YL, Li Z, Kabehie S, Botros YY, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. pH-operated nanopistons on the surfaces of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132:13016-25

84. Vallet-Regi M, Rámila A, Del Real RP, Pérez-Pariente J. A new property of MCM-41: drug delivery system. Chemistry of Materials. 2001;13:308-11

85. Mal NK, Fujiwara M, Tanaka Y. Photocontrolled reversible release of guest molecules from coumarin-modified mesoporous silica. Nature. 2003;421:350-3

86. Hernandez R, Tseng HR, Wong JW, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. An operational supramolecular nanovalve. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126:3370-1

87. Park C, Oh K, Lee SC, Kim C. Controlled release of guest molecules from mesoporous silica particles based on a pH-responsive polypseudorotaxane motif. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2007;46:1455-7

88. Angelos S, Yang YW, Patel K, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. pH-responsive supramolecular nanovalves based on cucurbit [6] uril pseudorotaxanes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2008;47:2222-6

89. Li Z, Nyalosaso JL, Hwang AA, Ferris DP, Yang S, Derrien G, Charnay C, Durand JO, Zink JI. Measurement of uptake and release capacities of mesoporous silica nanoparticles enabled by nanovalve gates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2011;115:19496-506

90. (a) Ambrogio MW, Thomas CR, Zhao YL, Zink JI, Stoddart JF. Mechanized silica nanoparticles: a new frontier in theranostic nanomedicine. Accounts of chemical research. 2011;44:903-13

91. Prasad R, Aiyer S, Chauhan DS, Srivastava R, Selvaraj K. Bioresponsive carbon nano-gated multifunctional mesoporous silica for cancer theranostics. Nanoscale. 2016;8:4537-46

92. Zhou L, Li Z, Liu Z, Ren J, Qu X. Luminescent carbon dot-gated nanovehicles for pH-triggered intracellular controlled release and imaging. Langmuir. 2013;29:6396-403

93. Chen T, Yu H, Yang N, Wang M, Ding C, Fu J. Graphene quantum dot-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles through an acid-cleavable acetal bond for intracellular drug delivery and imaging. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2014;2:4979-82

94. Lai CY, Trewyn BG, Jeftinija DM, Jeftinija K, Xu S, Jeftinija S, Lin VS. A mesoporous silica nanosphere-based carrier system with chemically removable CdS nanoparticle caps for stimuli-responsive controlled release of neurotransmitters and drug molecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125:4451-9

95. Giri S, Trewyn BG, Stellmaker MP, Lin VS. Stimuli-responsive controlled-release delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanorods capped with magnetic nanoparticles. Angewandte chemie International edition. 2005;44:5038-44

96. Nguyen TD, Tseng HR, Celestre PC, Flood AH, Liu Y, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. A reversible molecular valve. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102:10029-34

97. Liu R, Zhao X, Wu T, Feng P. Tunable redox-responsive hybrid nanogated ensembles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2008;130:14418-9

98. Zhu CL, Song XY, Zhou WH, Yang HH, Wen YH, Wang XR. An efficient cell-targeting and intracellular controlled-release drug delivery system based on MSN-PEM-aptamer conjugates. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009;19:7765-70

99. Cui Y, Dong H, Cai X, Wang D, Li Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles capped with disulfide-linked PEG gatekeepers for glutathione-mediated controlled release. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2012;4:3177-83

100. Mal NK, Fujiwara M, Tanaka Y. Photocontrolled reversible release of guest molecules from coumarin-modified mesoporous silica. Nature. 2003;421:350-3

101. Ferris DP, Zhao YL, Khashab NM, Khatib HA, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. Light-operated mechanized nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131:1686-8

102. Mei X, Yang S, Chen D, Li N, Li H, Xu Q, Ge J, Lu J. Light-triggered reversible assemblies of azobenzene-containing amphiphilic copolymer with β-cyclodextrin-modified hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for controlled drug release. Chemical Communications. 2012;48:10010-2

103. Li H, Tan LL, Jia P, Li QL, Sun YL, Zhang J, Ning YQ, Yu J, Yang YW. Near-infrared light-responsive supramolecular nanovalve based on mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods. Chemical Science. 2014;5:2804-8

104. Liu J, Bu W, Pan L, Shi J. NIR-triggered anticancer drug delivery by upconverting nanoparticles with integrated azobenzene-modified mesoporous silica. Angewandte Chemie. 2013;125:4471-5

105. Croissant J, Zink JI. Nanovalve-controlled cargo release activated by plasmonic heating. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134:7628-31

106. Li QL, Wang L, Qiu XL, Sun YL, Wang PX, Liu Y, Li F, Qi AD, Gao H, Yang YW. Stimuli-responsive biocompatible nanovalves based on β-cyclodextrin modified poly (glycidyl methacrylate). Polymer Chemistry. 2014;5:3389-95

107. Katiyar SK, Matsui MS, Mukhtar H. Kinetics of UV light-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in human skin in vivo: an immunohistochemical analysis of both epidermis and dermis. Photochemistry and photobiology. 2000;72:788-93

108. Cui S, Yin D, Chen Y, Di Y, Chen H, Ma Y, Achilefu S, Gu Y. In vivo targeted deep-tissue photodynamic therapy based on near-infrared light triggered upconversion nanoconstruct. ACS Nano. 2013;7:676-88

109. Fu QI, Rao GR, Ista LK, Wu YA, Andrzejewski BP, Sklar LA, Ward TL, López GP. Control of molecular transport through stimuli-responsive ordered mesoporous materials. Advanced Materials. 2003;15:1262-6

110. Liu C, Guo J, Yang W, Hu J, Wang C, Fu S. Magnetic mesoporous silica microspheres with thermo-sensitive polymer shell for controlled drug release. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2009;19:4764-70

111. You YZ, Kalebaila KK, Brock SL, Oupicky D. Temperature-controlled uptake and release in PNIPAM-modified porous silica nanoparticles. Chemistry of Materials. 2008;20:3354-9

112. Hu X, Hao X, Wu Y, Zhang J, Zhang X, Wang PC, Zou G, Liang XJ. Multifunctional hybrid silica nanoparticles for controlled doxorubicin loading and release with thermal and pH dual response. Journal of materials chemistry B. 2013;1:1109-18

113. Baeza A, Ruiz-Molina D, Vallet-Regí M. Recent advances in porous nanoparticles for drug delivery in antitumoral applications: inorganic nanoparticles and nanoscale metal-organic frameworks. Expert opinion on drug delivery. 2017;14:783-96

114. Mukaddes I, Maksoudian C, Manshian BB, Soenen SJ. The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:1746-1803

115. Miranda D, Carter K, Luo D, Shao S, Geng J, Li C, Chitgupi U, Turowski SG, Li N, Atilla-Gokcumen GE, Spernyak JA. Multifunctional Liposomes for Image-Guided Intratumoral Chemo-Phototherapy. Advanced healthcare materials. 2017Aug;6:1700253

116. Shao S, Do TN, Razi A, Chitgupi U, Geng J, Alsop RJ, Dzikovski BG, Rheinstädter MC, Ortega J, Karttunen M, Spernyak JA. Design of Hydrated Porphyrin-Phospholipid Bilayers with Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Contrast. Small. 2017;13:1602505

117. Sindhwani S, Syed AM, Ngai J, Kingston BR, Maiorino L, Rothschild J, MacMillan P, Zhang Y, Rajesh NU, Hoang T, Wu JL. The entry of nanoparticles into solid tumours. Nature materials. 2020;19:566-75

118. Naumenko VA, Vlasova KY, Garanina AS, Melnikov PA, Potashnikova DM, Vishnevskiy DA, Vodopyanov SS, Chekhonin VP, Abakumov MA, Majouga AG. Extravasating neutrophils open vascular barrier and improve liposomes delivery to tumors. ACS Nano. 2019;13:12599-612

119. Kingston BR, Lin ZP, Ouyang B, MacMillan P, Ngai J, Syed AM, Sindhwani S, Chan WC. Specific endothelial cells govern nanoparticle entry into solid tumors. ACS Nano. 2021;15:14080-94

120. Lin ZP, Nguyen LN, Ouyang B, MacMillan P, Ngai J, Kingston BR, Mladjenovic SM, Chan WC. Macrophages actively transport nanoparticles in tumors after extravasation. ACS Nano. 2022;16:6080-92

121. Nguyen LN, Lin ZP, Sindhwani S, MacMillan P, Mladjenovic SM, Stordy B, Ngo W, Chan WC. The exit of nanoparticles from solid tumours. Nature Materials. 2023;22:1261-1272

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding authors: Email:;

Received 2023-9-2
Accepted 2023-9-8
Published 2024-1-1

Citation styles

Prasad, R., Selvaraj, K. (2024). Choice of Nanoparticles for Theranostics Engineering: Surface Coating to Nanovalves Approach. Nanotheranostics, 8(1), 12-32.

Prasad, R.; Selvaraj, K. Choice of Nanoparticles for Theranostics Engineering: Surface Coating to Nanovalves Approach. Nanotheranostics 2024, 8 (1), 12-32. DOI: 10.7150/ntno.89768.

Prasad R, Selvaraj K. Choice of Nanoparticles for Theranostics Engineering: Surface Coating to Nanovalves Approach. Nanotheranostics 2024; 8(1):12-32. doi:10.7150/ntno.89768.

Prasad R, Selvaraj K. 2024. Choice of Nanoparticles for Theranostics Engineering: Surface Coating to Nanovalves Approach. Nanotheranostics. 8(1):12-32.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( See for full terms and conditions.